Skip to main content
· 9/25/1985

B. L. Goldberg & Associates, Inc. v. Uptown, Inc.

Citations

  • 705 P.2d 683
  • 103 N.M. 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “an order or judgment is not considered final unless all issues of law and fact have been determined and the case disposed of by the trial court to the fullest extent possible”
  • final judgment where trial court actually disposed of all issues of law and fact to the fullest extent possible
  • “For purposes of appeal, an order or judgment is not considered final unless all issues of law and fact have been determined and the case disposed of by the trial court to the fullest extent possible.”
  • rule in New Mexico is that “an order or judgment is not considered final unless all issues of law and fact have been determined and the case disposed of by the trial court to the fullest extent possible”
  • “For purposes of appeal, an order or judgment 13 is not considered final unless all issues of law and fact have been determined and the 14 case disposed of by the trial court to the fullest extent possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Federici, Riordan, Sosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.