Skip to main content
· 1/6/1896

B. H. Voskamp & Co. v. Connor

Citations

  • 173 Pa. 109
  • 33 A. 555
  • 1896 Pa. LEXIS 666

Syllabus

<p>Married women — •Sale of goods — Evidence—Question for jury.</p> <p>In an action against a married woman for goods sold and delivered where the defendant denies that she was engaged in the grocery business when the goods were sold and that she ever purchased any of them, and avers that they were sold to her husband and on his credit, and the evidence is conflicting, the case is for the jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff will not be disturbed.</p> <p>Practice, S. G. — Defective assignments.</p> <p>Where a specific portion of a charge is assigned for error, a second assignment, which alleges error in charging the jury as follows and for specification thereof recites the entire charge bodily, including the paragraph complained of in the first assignment, such an assignment is as far from being specific as it can well be made. An assignment which alleges error “ in submitting the ease to the jury under the evidence ” is equally defective.</p>

Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.