Skip to main content
· 5/7/2008

B & H Medical, L.L.C. v. ABP Administration, Inc.

Citations

  • 526 F.3d 257
  • 70 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 748
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9721
  • 2008 WL 1958393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an amended complaint renders the original a “nullity” that “no longer performs any function in the case”
  • explaining that “a prior ‘complaint is a nullity, because an amended complaint supersedes all prior complaints’”
  • noting that we will consider issues not raised below only in exceptional cases
  • affirming summary judgment and finding sanctionable plaintiffs’ failure to “address meaningfully the district court’s reasoning”
  • affirming summary judgment where plaintiffs failed to “address meaningfully the district court’s reasoning”
  • “[A] prior ‘complaint is a nullity, because an amended complaint super[s]edes all prior complaints[.]’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Gilman, Sutton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.