B & G Mining, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “attorneys who bill in tenth-hour increments might also overbill-the risk exists under both methods”
• noting that “receiving and filing correspondence presumably constitutes clerical work” which is not reimbursable
• “[Cjourts are permitted to, and in deed should, consider prior fee awards in determining the proper attorney’s fee rate”
• “By looking . . . to the level of experience, an adjudicator could reasonably conclude that a more experienced attorney would command a higher market rate than a less seasoned one, ceteris paribus.”
• “By looking . . . to the level of experience, an adjudicator could reasonably conclude that a more experienced attorney would command a higher market rate than a less seasoned one, ceteris paribus.”
• “receiving and filing correspondence presumably constitutes clerical work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).