B-G

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[t]o require [a] defendant to admit to his factual guilt during treatment, upon threat of incarceration, is directly inconsistent with [an Alford] plea agreement”
• holding, without any citation to authority that “[t]o require defendant to admit to his factual guilt during treatment, upon threat of incarceration, is directly inconsistent with the plea agreement entered into by the People, the defendant and the Justice Court”
• reversing probation revocation for defendant’s failure to admit guilt during sex offender therapy because requiring defendant to admit factual guilt during treatment after Alford plea was “directly inconsistent with” the Alford plea
• reversing probation revocation for defendant's failure to admit guilt during sex offender therapy because requiring defendant to admit factual guilt during treatment after Alford plea was \directly inconsistent with\ the Alford plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).