B. D. Woods & Sons v. Carencro Sugar Manufacturing Co.
Citations
- 105 La. 395
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The purchaser, as such, of a sugar refinery — outfit and plant — who assumes payment of claims secured by vendor’s lien upon the machinery, has no greater right to contest and repudiate such claims than his vendors had.</p> <p>2. If they would be bound, under the circumstances existing at the time of sale, to meet the obligation of the lien, so must he meet it.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the 12 underlying petition is ancillary to that state court proceeding and not removable to federal court”
- “Plaintiff’s petition commences a special proceeding . . . pursuant to CPLR 5225(b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blanchard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.