B & D Integrated Health Servs. v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.
Syllabus
Single State Agency – NCDHHS - Medicaid. - 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(5) Local Management Entity/Managed Care Organization Review of \Adverse Determination\ - N.C. Gen. Stat. § 108C-2(1) OAH Subject Matter Jurisdiction NCAPA N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 150B-1 to 52 Necessary or Proper Party Terms of the Contract Post Hoc Rationalization Order not reviewed
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a local suit to be a general adjudication because it “reaches all claims, perhaps month by month but inclusively in the totality”
- The McCar-ran Amendment “does not cover consent by the United States to be sued in a private suit to determine its rights against a few claimants.”
- Colorado state water proceeding which “reaches all claims, perhaps month by month but inclusively in the totality” is a general adjudication within the meaning of the McCarran Amendment.
- case involved general adjudication because it \reaches all claims\
- case involved general adjudication because it “reaches all claims”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.