· 11/19/1996
B. Benedict Waters v. Charles Young, and Paul Townsend and William Cormier
Citations
- 100 F.3d 1437
- 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 533
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8312
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 13827
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29935
- 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,415
- 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 817
- 1996 WL 665942
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a major purpose” of a motion under Rule 50(a) is to give the non-moving party notice of the defi- ciency
- under Rule 50, trial court has a responsibility to inform the non-moving party of deficiencies in its proof and to afford that party an opportunity to correct any such deficiency
- “[T]his court has long sought to ensure that pro se litigants do not unwittingly fall victim to procedural requirements that they may, with some assistance from the court, be able to satisfy.”
- “[TJhis court has long sought to ensure that pro se litigants do not unwittingly fall victim to procedural requirements that they may, with some assistance from the court, be able to satisfy.”
- “As a 14 general matter, this court has long sought to ensure that pro se litigants do not unwittingly 15 fall victim to procedural requirements that they may, with some assistance from the court, 16 be able to satisfy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Boochever, Reinhardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.