B & B STEEL ERECTORS v. Burnsed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “workers’ compensation judges do not have the power to determine the constitutionality of a portion of the Workers’ Compensation Act, and that such issues may be raised for the first time on appeal, without having been preserved below”
• noting workers’ compensation judges do not have authority to determine constitutionality of statutory provisions
• affirming JCC's order awarding W/C benefits to claimant based on statutory coverage
• stating “we note that workers’ compensation judges do not have the power to determine the constitutionality of a portion of the Workers’ Compensation Act, and that such issues may be raised for the first time on appeal, without having been preserved below”
• “[W]e note that workers’ compensation judges do not have the power to determine the constitutionality of a portion of the Workers’ Compensation Act, and that such issues may be raised for the first time on appeal, without having been preserved below.”
• “[W]e note that workers’ compensation judges do not have the power to determine the constitutionality of a portion of the Workers’ Compensa.tion Act, and that such issues may be raised for the first time on appeal, without having been preserved below.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).