· 7/14/1998
B & B Investment Group v. Gitler
Citations
- 581 N.W.2d 17
- 229 Mich. App. 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that well-settled common-law principles are not to be abolished by implication
- “The language of a statute should be read in light of previously established rules of the common law, including common-law adjudicatory principles.”
- “The statute contemplates recovery of attorney fees . . . expended in actions for slander of title, not simply to quiet title.”
- legislation must be interpreted in conformance with its express terms, even if in conflict with the common law
- “To establish slander of title at common law, a plaintiff must show falsity, malice, and special damages, i.e., that the defendant maliciously published false statements that disparaged a plaintiff’s right in property, causing special damages.”
- “To establish slander of title at common law, a plaintiff must show falsity, malice, and special damages, i.e., that the defendant maliciously published false statements that disparaged a plaintiffs right in property, causing special damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holbrook, White, Danhof
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.