Skip to main content
· 7/14/1998

B & B Investment Group v. Gitler

Citations

  • 581 N.W.2d 17
  • 229 Mich. App. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that well-settled common-law principles are not to be abolished by implication
  • “The language of a statute should be read in light of previously established rules of the common law, including common-law adjudicatory principles.”
  • “The statute contemplates recovery of attorney fees . . . expended in actions for slander of title, not simply to quiet title.”
  • legislation must be interpreted in conformance with its express terms, even if in conflict with the common law
  • “To establish slander of title at common law, a plaintiff must show falsity, malice, and special damages, i.e., that the defendant maliciously published false statements that disparaged a plaintiff’s right in property, causing special damages.”
  • “To establish slander of title at common law, a plaintiff must show falsity, malice, and special damages, i.e., that the defendant maliciously published false statements that disparaged a plaintiffs right in property, causing special damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holbrook, White, Danhof

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.