Federal Circuit· 11/6/2014
Azure Networks, LLC v. Csr, Plc
Citations
- 771 F.3d 1336
- 112 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1817
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21188
- 2014 WL 5741337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there is a heavy presumption in favor of the ordinary meaning
- stating that “[t]here is a heavy presumption that claim terms carry their accustomed meaning in the relevant community at the relevant time.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- applying a com- bined analysis and finding a patent owner lacked an exclu- sionary right because it transferred away all substantial rights
- “There is a heavy presumption that claim terms carry their accustomed meaning in the relevant community at the relevant time.”
- “There is a heavy presumption that claim terms carry their accustomed meaning in the relevant community at the relevant time.”
- “There is a heavy presumption that claim terms carry their accustomed meaning in the relevant community at the relevant time.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reyna, Mayer, Chen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.