Skip to main content
· 4/19/2004

Aztar Indiana Gaming Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

Citations

  • 806 N.E.2d 381
  • 2004 Ind. Tax LEXIS 28
  • 2004 WL 835965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining payments made for Indiana’s Riverboat Wagering Tax were subject to the add-back provision because the tax was measured by receipts, even though the tax was an excise tax

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.