AZRAG

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Complaints by competitors, standing alone, are not sufficient to show a conspiracy.”
• “Complaints by competitors, standing alone, are not sufficient to show a conspiracy.”
• “A plaintiff must introduce ‘something more’ than evidence of complaints and termination alone ... [tjhere must be ‘direct or circumstantial evidence’ that reasonably tends to prove ... ‘a conscious commitment to a common scheme designed to achieve an unlawful objective.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).