Azim v. Department of Central Management Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the errors of ministerial officers whom the plaintiffs cannot control should not serve to deprive them of their right to appeal”
• explaining that “errors of ministerial officers whom the plaintiffs cannot control should not serve to deprive them of their right to appeal”
• finding that the plaintiffs attorney in an administrative review had a right to rely on the assurances of an employee of the clerk’s office that a complaint would be timely file-stamped
• finding that the plaintiff’s attorney in an administrative review had a right to rely on the assurances of an employee of the clerk’s office that a complaint would be timely file-stamped
• plaintiffs had a right to rely on statement made by the clerk’s office that complaint would be file-stamped on a particular date
• errors of circuit court clerk over whom a party has no control do not deprive the party of his right to appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).