Azcona v. Tibbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court held that negligence of jail was not the proximate cause of harm and the actions of escaping prisoner was an intervening cause of harm
• court held that negligence of jail was not the proximate cause of harm and the actions of escaping prisoner was an intervening cause of harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).