Ayuda, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an agency “is not required to comply with a request that is ‘so broad as to impose an unreasonable burden upon the agency’”
• holding that a search requiring more than 8,000 hours of work was unreasonable
• holding that even though the plaintiffs did not raise a particular issue in their initial FOIA request, the exhaustion requirement did not apply to that issue because the agency addressed the issue in its response to the appeal of that request
• holding that even though the plaintiffs did not raise a particular issue in their initial FOIA request, the exhaustion requirement did not apply to that issue because the agency addressed the issue in its response to the appeal of that request
• holding an agency’s affidavits must show with “reasonable specificity” why further segregation of documents, properly withheld under FOIA exemptions, would be unreasonably burdensome
• holding an agency’s affidavits must show with “reasonable specificity” why further segregation of documents, properly withheld under FOIA exemptions, would be unreasonably burdensome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).