Skip to main content
· 8/4/2004

Ayres v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Citations

  • 97 P.3d 1
  • 194 Or. App. 429
  • 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “party must present the particular challenges it intends to raise on judicial review first to the administrative body whose review must be exhausted”
  • a “party must present the particular challenges it intends to raise on judicial review first to the administrative body whose review must be exhausted”
  • a “party must present the particular challenges it intends to raise on judicial review first to the administrative body whose review must be exhausted”
  • “an ARR must raise and preserve with specificity all issues to be later presented on judicial review”
  • “[T]he party must pres- ent the particular challenges it intends to raise on judicial review first to the administrative body whose review must be exhausted.”
  • “[T]he exhaustion doctrine implies not only the existence of an administrative procedure to exhaust but also its ‘availability’ to the persons who must pursue it.” (Quoting Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Washington Co., 282 Or 591, 618, 581 P2d 50 (1978).)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Linder, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.