Aymond v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE & TAX.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he right to sue in conversion may be defeated by any act or conduct which amounts to an estoppel.” (emphasis added)
• “Conversion is . . . an act in derogation of the plaintiff’s possessory rights.” (citing, among others, Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 475 So. 2d 756, 760 (La. 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).