Aylett v. Universal Frozen Foods Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• arguing that in Top Service, the court never stated that to prove a claim for tortious inference there must be evidence that the defendant intended to injure the plaintiff, as opposed to anyone else
• potato growers could bring action for intentional interference with their relationship with a prospective buyer
• customary practice in potato industry as it relates to release of right of first refusal does not control over actual language of the parties’ contract
• potato growers could bring action for intentional interference with their relationship with a prospective buyer
• amount of attorney fees attributable to a particular claim is a question of fact; we may not reverse the trial court’s calculation of that amount unless there is no evidence to support it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).