Ayers v. Watson
Citations
- 137 U.S. 584
- 11 S. Ct. 201
- 34 L. Ed. 803
- 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2047
Syllabus
<p>The allowance of an amendment to' an application for the removal of a cause from a State Court, if allowable at all, is a matter of discretion, to which error cannot be assigned.</p> <p>When the monuments and other landmarks upon a tract of land in Texas correspond in part with the field notes of the. survey, and in part either do not conform to it or cannot be found, the footsteps of the original surveyor may be traced backward as well as forward, and any ascertained monument in the survey may be adopted as a starting point for its recovery.</p> <p>A memorandum made by a public surveyor in Texas at the time of the survey, and deposited in the General Land Office at the time when the title was deposited- there, is admissible in evidence to aid in proving the actual footsteps of the surveyor when making the survey.</p> <p>Original field notes of a public surveyor deposited in the General Land Office of Texas are held by the highest court of that State to be competent evidence to identify the granted premises; and this court, if it doubted as to their admissibility for that purpose, would be largely influenced by such decisions.</p> <p>A writ of error does not lie for granting or refusing a new trial.</p> <p>.In seeking to trace a survey on the ground, the corner called for in the grant as the “ beginning ” corner' does not control more than any other corner equally well ascertained, and it is not necessary to follow the calls of the grant in the order in which they stand in the field notes; but they may be reversed, and should be when by doing it the land embraced would most nearly harmonize all the calls and objects of the grant.</p> <p>If an insurmountable difficulty is met with in running the lines of a survey of public land in one direction; and all the known calls of the survey • are met by running them in the reverse direction, it is only a dictate of common sense to follow the latter course.</p> <p>When an instruction asked for has been substantially given,
Judges: Bradley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court· 1935-01-07· cited 819×
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court· 1933-01-09· cited 354×
- Wood v. StarkoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2006-04-12· cited 173×
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-05-04· cited 100×
- Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-08-01· cited 57×
- Berenbeim v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1947-11-05· cited 32×
- Lewis v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1924-02-05· cited 26×
- Blanton v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1914-03-16· cited 21×
- James Thompson, in No. 14943 v. Trent Maritime Co., Ltd., in No. 14943. In No. 14913 v. B. H. Sobelman & Co., Inc., in No. 14913Third Circuit· 1965-11-16· cited 19×
- Cohen v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.D.C. Circuit· 1940-06-17· cited 19×
- Hancey v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1940-01-06· cited 18×
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WattsFourth Circuit· 1895-02-05· cited 18×
- Lawrence Bernardo v. Bethlehem Steel CompanySecond Circuit· 1963-03-07· cited 16×
- Olson v. JudeMontana Supreme Court· 2003-07-15· cited 16×
- Arnett Alexander and Walworth Trucking Corp. v. Kramer Bros. Freight Lines, Inc.Second Circuit· 1959-12-29· cited 15×
- United States v. Heyward-Robinson CompanySecond Circuit· 1970-07-24· cited 15×
- Calder v. Hillsboro Land CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-08-05· cited 15×
- Barnhart v. EhrhartOregon Supreme Court· 1898-08-13· cited 13×
- Prichard v. BuddFourth Circuit· 1896-11-10· cited 13×
- Southwestern Virginia Imp. Co. v. FrariFourth Circuit· 1893-10-04· cited 12×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.