Ayers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff had not sufficiently alleged her employer’s conduct was outrageous where she alleged that the employer “negligently trained and supervised its managerial employees”
• granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment because plaintiff halted EEOC’s investigation into her claims and failed to satisfy FCRA’s administrative prerequisites to filing suit
• granting defendant’s summary judgment, but recognizing that a plaintiff may defeat summary judgment where factual issues exists as to whether employee’s tortious action “in some way furthered the interest of defendant” or were “at least motivated by a purpose to serve” defendant’s interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).