Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/16/1997

Ayers v. Fordice

Citations

  • 111 F.3d 1183
  • 1997 WL 197346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a formula for allocating funds to public universities was not traceable to de jure segregation
  • upholding district court's finding that duplicative programs did not have segregative effects when the institutions were not geographically proximate
  • “The issue of programmatic enhancement directly implicates policies governing institutional missions, which the district court found to be traceable to the de jure system and to have current segregative effects.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Jolly, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ayers v. Fordice

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.