Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs were entitled to receive liquidated damages as a matter of law, but deferring the precise amount for “determin[ation] in a subsequent proceeding”
• holding that the plaintiffs were entitled to receive liquidated damages as a matter of law, but deferring the precise amount for \determin[ation] in a subsequent proceeding\
• “Knowing that the FLSA applies and ‘simply deciding] not to comply’ ... is an example of a willful violation.”
• finding that “entitlement to equitable tolling will depend on more than Defendants’ alleged failure to post FLSA notices.”
• finding that “[k]nowing that the FLSA applies and ‘simply deciding not to comply’ . . . is an example of a willful violation”
• finding that \[k]nowing that the FLSA applies and 'simply deciding not to comply' ... is an example of a willful violation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).