Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
District of Columbia· 3/4/2015

Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.

Citations

  • 82 F. Supp. 3d 279
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25804
  • 2015 WL 968113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs were entitled to receive liquidated damages as a matter of law, but deferring the precise amount for “determin[ation] in a subsequent proceeding”
  • holding that the plaintiffs were entitled to receive liquidated damages as a matter of law, but deferring the precise amount for \determin[ation] in a subsequent proceeding\
  • “Knowing that the FLSA applies and ‘simply deciding] not to comply’ ... is an example of a willful violation.”
  • finding that “entitlement to equitable tolling will depend on more than Defendants’ alleged failure to post FLSA notices.”
  • finding that “[k]nowing that the FLSA applies and ‘simply deciding not to comply’ . . . is an example of a willful violation”
  • finding that \[k]nowing that the FLSA applies and 'simply deciding not to comply' ... is an example of a willful violation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.