Skip to main content
· 11/25/1987

Ayala v. Center Line, Inc.

Citations

  • 415 N.W.2d 603
  • 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 157
  • 1987 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1329
  • 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding in a civil rights case the judge, not the jury, is to determine'the award of attorney fees to be paid to the prevailing-plaintiff under the applicable statute
  • following issuance of right-to-sue letter, parties not contending that jury trial was error; court holding that assessment of attorney’s fees under Iowa Code § 601A.15(8)(a)(8) is equitable issue for the court
  • although plaintiffs jury request was honored by trial court, Supreme Court holding that issue of reasonable attorney’s fees is decided by the court
  • “[S]uch fees are separate and distinct from the underlying civil rights violation and are incurred only to remedy the harm already done.”
  • “The reason for awarding attorney fees in such a case is to ensure that private citizens can afford to pursue the legal actions necessary to advance the public interest vindicated by the policies of civil rights acts.”
  • “The reason for awarding attorneys fees in [a civil rights case] is to ensure that private citizens can afford to pursue the legal actions necessary to advance the public interest vindicated by the policies of civil rights acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Carter, Lavorato, Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.