A.Y. v. E.Y.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1671
Syllabus
Allocation of parental rights and responsibilities abuse-of-discretion standard R.C. 3109.04 provision of residential address R.C. 111.46 Ohio Safe at Home Program withdrawal order posting a bond R.C. 3121.03. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it found it was in the best interests of the children to designate Appellee as the residential parent and legal custodian where the record supported the court's interpretation of the R.C. 3109.04(F) best interest factors. The trial court's utilization of Appellant's designated mailing address conformed with Appellant's status as an Ohio Safe at Home participant. Appellant's argument that the trial court should have required Appellee to be subject to a withholding order or post a bond for the payment of support was without merit. Where the divorce judgment entry included conflicting withholding orders, the matter was remanded for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment entry that accurately reflects the court's disposition on withholding.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.