Axel Johnson, Inc. v. Carroll Carolina Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the plaintiff failed to invoke diversity jurisdiction when “the complaint alleged neither citizenship nor domicile, but only residence”
• explaining that citizenship of an individual defendant depends on domicile
• “[S]tate citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction depends not on residence, but on national citizenship and domicile . . . and the existence of such citizenship cannot be inferred from allegations of mere residence, standing alone.”
• “[C]itizenship cannot be inferred from allegations of mere residence, standing alone.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).