Skip to main content
· 10/17/2003

Axa Corporate Solutions, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Underwriters Reinsurance Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 347 F.3d 272
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 21062
  • 2003 WL 22359249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • praising district court’s careful consideration of all 10 factors and affirming denial of stay
  • “The district court found that the fact that only state-law claims were at issue did not carry much weight, because it had jurisdiction in any event because of the diversity of the parties.”
  • “Parties might prefer the notice-pleading regime of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure over the fact-pleading approach that prevails in Illinois courts, but no one thinks that the Illinois rules of pleading are binding on the federal courts.”
  • “we have recognized a general presumption against abstention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Wood, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.