Aware, Inc. v. CENTILLIUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss where contract contained an ambiguity and language elsewhere in the agreement “confirms that plaintiff’s proposed interpretation is at least plausible”
• finding “no reason to require plaintiff to choose a theory of recovery” at the pleading stage and noting that “courts have been flexible regarding when they require this choice to be made”
• finding “no reason to require plaintiff to choose a theory of recovery” at the pleading stage and noting that “courts have been flexible regarding when they require this choice to be made”
• finding “no reason to require plaintiff to choose a theory of recovery” at the pleading stage of the litigation and refusing to dismiss claim for unjust enrichment even though plaintiff asserted claim for breach of contract
• defendant reaped the benefits from the agreement while avoiding most of its obligations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).