Skip to main content
· 9/9/1998

A.W. Ex Rel. C. v. Marlborough Co.

Citations

  • 25 F. Supp. 2d 27
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16786
  • 1998 WL 737875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting summary judgment for the school board on the plaintiffs Rehabilitation Act claim because the plaintiff did “not allege discrimination on the basis of his disability, but instead simply challenges the adequacy of his [free appropriate public education]”
  • “A procedural error, by itself, is insufficient to warrant the protections of the Rehabilitation Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nevas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.