Avrill v. The Steamer Alabama Belle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the state’s 75 percent share should not be aggregated with an 27 1 individual plaintiff’s 25 percent share
• “The allegations of the complaint 18 do not, standing alone, justify an assumption that plaintiff incurred overtime every week, or in 19 any particular amount.”
• “California law is clear that a 9 ‘subsequent violation’ level applies only to violations after the employer is on notice that its 10 continued conduct is unlawful.”
• discussing district court split on this issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).