· 6/13/1960
Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John Wanamaker
Citations
- 279 F.2d 607
- 125 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 607
- 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “balancing the conflicting interests both parties have in the unimpaired continuation of their trademark use”
- the “Hay-makers” mark ... as applied to women’s shoes is fanciful and arbitrary
- involving counterclaim by defendants in a trademark 9 infringement action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Hincks, Friendly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.