Skip to main content
· 6/13/1960

Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John Wanamaker

Citations

  • 279 F.2d 607
  • 125 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 607
  • 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “balancing the conflicting interests both parties have in the unimpaired continuation of their trademark use”
  • the “Hay-makers” mark ... as applied to women’s shoes is fanciful and arbitrary
  • involving counterclaim by defendants in a trademark 9 infringement action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Hincks, Friendly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.