· 6/18/2004
Avocados Plus Inc v. Veneman, Ann M.
Citations
- 370 F.3d 1243
- 361 U.S. App. D.C. 519
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12008
- 2004 WL 1364255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that one of the advantages of administrative review is that the objections of various parties can be worked out without the more dramatic measure of a federal lawsuit
- observing that “the existence of an administrative remedy automatically triggers a non-jurisdictional exhaustion inquiry”
- explaining that so-called “jurisdictional exhaustion” is “rooted ... in Congress' power to control the jurisdiction of the federal courts”
- explaining that one of the purposes of the exhaustion doctrine is to alert agencies to problems with internal policies so they can self-correct
- observing that “the existence of an administrative remedy automatically triggers a non-jurisdictional exhaustion inquiry”
- stating that “[i]f the statute does mandate exhaustion, a court cannot excuse it”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Randolph, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.