Skip to main content
· 6/18/2004

Avocados Plus Inc v. Veneman, Ann M.

Citations

  • 370 F.3d 1243
  • 361 U.S. App. D.C. 519
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12008
  • 2004 WL 1364255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that one of the advantages of administrative review is that the objections of various parties can be worked out without the more dramatic measure of a federal lawsuit
  • observing that “the existence of an administrative remedy automatically triggers a non-jurisdictional exhaustion inquiry”
  • explaining that so-called “jurisdictional exhaustion” is “rooted ... in Congress' power to control the jurisdiction of the federal courts”
  • explaining that one of the purposes of the exhaustion doctrine is to alert agencies to problems with internal policies so they can self-correct
  • observing that “the existence of an administrative remedy automatically triggers a non-jurisdictional exhaustion inquiry”
  • stating that “[i]f the statute does mandate exhaustion, a court cannot excuse it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Randolph, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.