Avington v. Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that OFAC's disclosure of \only one of three reasons for its investigation and designation\ rendered the notice \incomplete\ such that it did \not meet the requirements of due process\
• discussing authority that a warrant may not be required when “intrusions ‘are defined narrowly and specifically in the regulations that authorize them’”
• reviewing the Office of Foreign Assets Control designating an Islamic organization a ‘specially designated global terrorist’
• affirming dismissal of due process claims where the court was “confident that [the errors] would not have changed [the decisionmaker’s] ultimate . . . determination”
• finding special needs exception did not apply in part because seizure at issue was not limited to a “well-defined” class of persons, such as probationers or public employees
• “In many cases, though, some information could be summarized or presented to a lawyer with a security clearance without implicating national security.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).