Skip to main content
· 10/2/1989

Avila v. Coca-Cola Co.

Citations

  • 728 F. Supp. 685
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15819
  • 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,096
  • 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1615
  • 1989 WL 158484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiffs cannot amend complaint by asserting new facts or theories in opposition to motion to dismiss
  • dismissing conspiracy claim where “the Complaint does not set forth any specific facts that indicate any sort of meeting of the minds between” defendants
  • “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by asserting new facts or theories for the first time in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
  • “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by asserting new . . . theories for the first time in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
  • “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by asserting new . . . theories for the first time in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
  • “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by asserting new . . . theories for the first time in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.