· 10/2/1989
Avila v. Coca-Cola Co.
Citations
- 728 F. Supp. 685
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15819
- 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,096
- 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1615
- 1989 WL 158484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding plaintiffs cannot amend complaint by asserting new facts or theories in opposition to motion to dismiss
- dismissing conspiracy claim where “the Complaint does not set forth any specific facts that indicate any sort of meeting of the minds between” defendants
- “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by asserting new facts or theories for the first time in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
- “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by asserting new . . . theories for the first time in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
- “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by asserting new . . . theories for the first time in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
- “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by asserting new . . . theories for the first time in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.