Avila v. Citimortgage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claim against private actors acting in their private capacities fails to state viable due process claim
• concluding that plaintiffs’ claims of improper debt collection practices pertaining to foreclosure on their residence “are not cognizable under . . . the [FDCPA] . . . because none of the defendants [is a] ‘debt collector[]’ as defined by” the FDCPA”
• noting that “§ 1986 claims are predicated on the existence of § 1985 claims,” and if the latter fails, the § 1986 claim also fails
• stating that “foreclosure proceedings, while undoubtedly unpleasant, are not uncommon and cannot because of the process alone ‘be regarded as atrocious [or] utterly intolerable in a civilized community’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).