Aviation Specialties, Inc. v. United Technologies Corporation, Pratt-Whitney Aircraft of Canada, Ltd., and Airwork Division of Pacific Airmotive, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Establishing a violation of Section 2 requires showing an intent on the defendants’ part to bring about a monopoly and a dangerous probability of success.”
• continuance refused where nonmovant had failed to initiate discovery even though its action had been on file for six months
• “When the record becomes clear enough to disclose that further discovery is not needed to develop significant aspects of the case . . . discovery should be ended.”
• “When the record becomes clear enough to disclose that further discovery is not needed to develop significant aspects of the case . . . discovery should be ended.”
• “When the record becomes clear enough to disclose that further discovery is not needed to develop significant aspects of the case . . . discovery should be ended.”
• denial of discovery reviewed on abuse of discretion standard; “[w]hen the record becomes clear enough to disclose that further discovery is not ... likely to produce a genuine issue of material fact, discovery should be ended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).