Aviation Charter, Inc. v. Aviation Research Group/us Joseph Moeggenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that not all statements are susceptible of being proven true or false
• concluding that ratings are non-actionable opinion statements
• when defendant assigned ratings of ‘‘Does Not Qualify,’’ ‘‘Silver,’’ ‘‘Gold’’ and ‘‘Platinum,’’ rating of plaintiff as ‘‘Does Not Qualify’’ was not sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false
• defendant’s safety rating of plaintiff air charter services provider constituted nonactionable opinion
• ‘‘sub- jective interpretation of multiple objective data points’’ constitutes opinion
• finding ratings inactionable opinion statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).