Avery v. Howell
Citations
- 96 Kan. 657
- 153 P. 532
- 1915 Kan. LEXIS 457
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Evidence — Conflict of Testimony — Question for the Jury. The rule in Acker v. Norman, 72 Kan. 586, 84 Pac. 531, is again followed, and there being some evidence to support defendants’ case, held, it was error to sustain the demurrer.</p> <p>2. Action — Agent’s Commission — Trial—Ignoring Second Defense — • Error. In an action to recover a real-estate agent’s commission, the answer set up, first, plaintiffs’ fraud, whereby defendants were induced to make an agreement with a third party fór an exchange of properties; second, that such third party was not ready, able and willing to carry out the agreement; held, error to ignore the second defense and to submit only the defense of fraud.</p>
Judges: Porter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Acker v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-01-06· cited 35×
- Valley Township v. StilesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-04-11· cited 8×
- Terry v. Kansas Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1914-10-10· cited 6×
- Bowes v. SlySupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-10-09· cited 6×
- Madden v. StegmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-11-09· cited 4×
- Avery v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-01-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.