Avery v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that requested information was not protected health information and that, even if it was protected health information, it was still subject to disclosure
• explaining that if a complaint alleges a claim for common law fraud, a court can “nevertheless treat the claim as one for promissory fraud if the claim is more accurately characterized as such under state law.”
• explaining the Illinois exception to the general rule that statements regarding future events are not a proper basis for fraud
• non-reliance clauses in a contract can preclude fraud claims “because they inherently disprove reasonableness.”
• non-reliance clauses in a contract can preclude fraud claims “because they inherently disprove reasonableness.”
• identifying similar language in a contract as an integration clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).