Aversano v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it was fundamental error for the trial court not to instruct the jury on its obligation under section 812.025
• stating in dicta that “Hall and a plain reading of [section 812.025] make it clear that the state was not entitled to have a jury convict [the defendant] of both [grand theft and dealing in stolen property] counts and then have the trial court adjudicate her guilty of grant theft”
• ineffective assistance of counsel apparent on face of record based on failure to request a specific jury instruction
• ineffective assistance of counsel apparent on face of record based on failure to request a specific jury instruction
• “With rare exceptions, ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be raised in a motion for post-conviction relief because they are generally fact-specific.”
• “With rare exceptions, ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be raised in a motion for post- conviction relief because they are generally fact-specific.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).