· 10/3/1997
Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. Seatex
Citations
- 126 F.3d 1279
- 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2216
- 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1039
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 27170
- 1997 WL 608591
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a “choice of law analysis is generally unnecessary if the relevant states have enacted identical controlling statutes”
- holding the district court must hold a jury trial on the existence of the agreement to arbitrate where the parties raise genuine issues of material fact regarding the making of the agreement to arbitrate
- providing for de novo review of a district court’s decision to “deny a jury trial on the factual question of whether the parties agreed to arbitrate”
- “The existence of an agreement to arbitrate is a threshold matter which must be established before the FAA can be invoked.”
- whether an agreement to arbitrate exists at all “is a threshold matter which must be established before the FAA3 can be invoked.”
- “The existence of an agreement to arbitrate is a threshold matter which must be established before the FAA can be invoked.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Brorby, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.