Skip to main content
· 10/3/1997

Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. Seatex

Citations

  • 126 F.3d 1279
  • 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2216
  • 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1039
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 27170
  • 1997 WL 608591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “choice of law analysis is generally unnecessary if the relevant states have enacted identical controlling statutes”
  • holding the district court must hold a jury trial on the existence of the agreement to arbitrate where the parties raise genuine issues of material fact regarding the making of the agreement to arbitrate
  • providing for de novo review of a district court’s decision to “deny a jury trial on the factual question of whether the parties agreed to arbitrate”
  • “The existence of an agreement to arbitrate is a threshold matter which must be established before the FAA can be invoked.”
  • whether an agreement to arbitrate exists at all “is a threshold matter which must be established before the FAA3 can be invoked.”
  • “The existence of an agreement to arbitrate is a threshold matter which must be established before the FAA can be invoked.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Brorby, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.