Avco Financial Services Consumer Discount Co. One, Inc. v. Taxation Division Director

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no “possible prejudicial impact” in part because of how little an incident was “discussed by him or the other jurors”
• affirming the decision of the district court to allow the defendant to read only relevant grand jury testimony to the jury
• finding no “possible prejudicial impact” in part because of how little an incident was “discussed by him or the other jurors”
• finding no “possible prejudicial impact” in part because of how little an incident was “discussed by him or the other jurors”
• self-identification by speaker on phone registered to defendant's parents, plus fact that defendant was present at parents' house when visited by DEA agent, adequately establishes that speaker was the defendant
• subsequent delivery \several weeks\ after counts alleged in indictment relevant to show intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).