Avant v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable estoppel did not apply because “Boyd was not affirmatively misled by a Postal Service official”
• holding that claims brought under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act must first be brought before the agency
• holding that 16 the Post Office did not waive right to contest timeliness because it accepted a complaint 17 and began investigation
• finding that the Rehabilitation Act \is the exclusive remedy for discrimination in employment by the Postal Service on the basis of handicap.\
• noting that the Rehabilitation Act incorporates the types of discrimination claims available under the ADA
• noting that the 25 Rehabilitation Act incorporates the types of discrimination claims available under the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).