AUTUMN JOURNEY HOSPICE, INC. v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding related where “[e]ach case . . . presents identical issues for resolution” (emphasis added)
• involving a challenge to the legitimacy of a Medicare hospice care reimbursement cap that had been applied to the plaintiffs
• \[T]here is substantial overlap in both the factual underpinning and the legal matters in dispute in each of these hospice cap cases.\
• “[T]here is substantial overlap in both the factual underpinning and the legal matters in dispute in each of these hospice cap cases.”
• “Congress intended to establish [ ] a framework under which providers have recourse to immediate judicial review whenever the [Board] makes a no authority determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).