· 2/7/2024
AUTUMN DAWN BRETON v. ELPIDIO AUGUSTO BRETON
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding validity of regulation prohibiting staking signs in the ground as demonstrators could instead carry signs and hand out leaflets
- upholding regulations that restricted demonstrations and other activities on the sidewalk directly in front of the White House
- describing the special esthetic considerations relevant to restrictions on demonstrations at the White House
- describing the special esthetic considerations relevant to restrictions on demonstrations at the White House
- upholding a ban regarding the regulation of sign size to promote the governmental interest in preserving unobstructed views to the White House
- finding overwhelming interest in presidential security, among other things, justified parcels regulation, regulation limiting types of signs used on White House sidewalk, and regulation restricting (but not prohibiting) demonstrations in the center of the sidewalk
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.