Louisiana Court of Appeal· 8/20/1986
Autry v. Woodall
Citations
- 493 So. 2d 716
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- letter accusing plaintiff of being “vindictive” was expression of opinion and therefore not defamatory as a matter of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marvin, Fred W. Jones, Jr., and Sexton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Taylor v. Town of ArcadiaLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-01-20· cited 20×
- Wainwright v. TylerLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-06-27· cited 11×
- Ernst v. BassettLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-02-08· cited 9×
- Christian v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-04-08· cited 8×
- Russo v. Conde Nast PublicationsE.D. Louisiana· 1992-11-17· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carter v. Catfish CabinLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1975-07-01· cited 63×
- Brown v. News-World Publishing Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1971-03-02· cited 33×
- Weatherall v. Department of Health and Human ResourcesLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-05-17· cited 23×
- Heft v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1974-12-13· cited 8×
- Coffee v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1903-02-02· cited 8×
- Foote v. SarafyanLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1982-12-01· cited 6×
- B-W Acceptance Corp. v. ClarksonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1963-06-04· cited 6×
- Deville v. Defending Attorneys for Continental Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-04-11· cited 2×
- Westbrook v. PrinceLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1985-02-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.