Skip to main content
· 5/11/1896

Autrey v. Cain

Citations

  • 98 Ga. 432
  • 25 S.E. 511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a condo owner “may bring a derivative action on behalf of the condominium” but may not generally “sue individually to protect his or her interest in the common elements of the condominium”
  • noting New York statute indicating that common profits and expenses are respectively distributed among, and charged to the unit owners in accordance with their respective interests
  • “There is no fiduciary relationship between the sponsor and the condominium.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumpkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.