Autonomous Region of Narcotics Anon v. Narcotics Anon World Svcs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that examining doctor’s “statement that the victim’s normal examination was ‘consistent with her disclosures’ . . . should not have been admitted”
• concluding that under the facts present there, “the defendant should have known the substance of the [examining] doctor’s testimony in advance”
• improper for social worker to testify about steps department took to \seek custody of the victim\
• permissible for witness to provide \background information about the social worker's duties and how she became involved in the case\
• under former fresh complaint doctrine no error where testimony \included background information about the social worker's duties and how she became involved in the case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).