Skip to main content
· 1/17/1966

Automation Devices, Inc. v. Smalenberger

Citations

  • 382 U.S. 974
  • 86 S. Ct. 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • arguing that Chapman can be read to support either test but that a standard similar to the overwhelming evidence test seems to be more proper
  • arguing that Chapman can be read to support either test but that a standard similar to the overwhelming evidence test seems to be more proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.