Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Washington’s Industrial Insurance Act generally precludes employee recovery for on-the-job injuries outside of the workers’ compensation scheme, unless injury results to a worker from the employer’s deliberate intention to produce such injury
• “Disregard of a risk of injury is not sufficient to meet the first Birklid prong; certainty of actual harm must be known and ignored”
• summary judgment is proper where the nonmoving party fails to “‘present evidence that demonstrates that material facts are in dispute’” (quoting Atherton Condo. Apartment-Owners Ass’n Bd. of Dirs. v. Blume Dev. Co., 115 Wn.2d 506, 515-16, 799 P.2d 250 (1990))
• discussing Washington’s historically narrow interpretation of RCW 51.24.020
• discussing Washington's historically narrow interpretation of RCW 51.24.020
• describing nonmoving party’s motion on summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).